Risk Management / Quantification

Events

Views Navigation

Event Views Navigation

Today

    • From Compliance Checkbox to Competitive Advantage: Third-party Risk Management as a Business Enabler

    Many organizations still treat Third-party Risk Management (TPRM) as a security function and as a compliance checkbox. But third-party risk isn’t just a cybersecurity issue—it’s a business risk that touches every corner of the enterprise. More important, third-party risk doesn’t stay in the risk register—it lands in the boardroom. And leadership wants answers: What’s the exposure? What’s the plan? How fast can we act? To unlock its full potential, TPRM must evolve into a business-aligned function that delivers clarity, confidence, and control across the enterprise. Topics include: • Aligning TPRM outcomes with enterprise risk strategy • Communicating vendor risk to executive stakeholders • Using TPRM to support growth and innovation Join us and learn how to elevate third-party risk management from a reactive task to a driver of business resilience.
    Topics:
    , , ,

    • Mapping What Matters: Risk Management That Drives Business Impact

    Despite growing investments in cybersecurity, many organizations still struggle to reduce real risk. Why? Because dashboards don’t reduce risk—action does. To reduce real risk, organizations must operationalize cyber risk strategies—prioritizing action over reporting, and aligning security efforts with measurable business outcomes. Topics include: • Making cyber risk visible, measurable, and relevant to business leaders • Linking asset visibility to business-critical risk decisions • Moving from reporting risk to actively reducing it—at scale Learn how to operationalize your risk strategy to prioritize action, align security with business outcomes, and turn visibility into measurable impact.
    Topics:
    , , ,

    Two People Managing 300 Vendors: Why Your TPRM Program Is Running on Willpower

    Nearly three-quarters of organizations have two or fewer full-time employees managing vendor risk, even though more than half oversee 300 or more third-party relationships. Close to half experienced a third-party cyber event in the past year. The math does not work, and most TPRM teams know it. They are running on spreadsheets, manually chasing questionnaire responses, and conducting annual assessments that produce a point-in-time snapshot of a continuously changing risk surface.

    Regulatory pressure is intensifying at the same time. Two-thirds of institutions face demands to enhance their TPRM programs, and frameworks like DORA and updated SEC disclosure requirements are raising the stakes for third-party oversight. The gap between what regulators expect and what lean TPRM teams can deliver is widening.

    Closing that gap requires coordination across assessment automation, continuous monitoring, risk intelligence, and third-party visibility platforms to scale coverage without scaling headcount.

    Topics include:

    • Automating vendor risk assessments to scale coverage without scaling headcount
    • Moving from annual questionnaires to continuous third-party monitoring
    • Prioritizing vendor oversight based on actual risk rather than treating all vendors equally

    Learn how resource-constrained TPRM teams are closing the gap between regulatory expectations and operational reality.

    Topics:
    , , , , ,

    You’re Patching the Wrong Vulnerabilities. Exploit Intelligence Says So.

    With more than 40,000 new CVEs published in the past year alone and projections exceeding 50,000 for 2025, patching everything is impossible. Most organizations prioritize remediation by CVSS severity scores, but severity does not equal exploitability. Research shows that 32% of reported security issues have a low probability of exploitation, while some moderate-severity vulnerabilities sit on active exploit chains right now.

    The shift from vulnerability management to exposure management reflects a growing recognition that context matters more than volume. Organizations need to know not just what is vulnerable but whether a vulnerability is reachable from the internet, whether an exploit exists in the wild, what business-critical assets sit in the blast radius, and how quickly an attacker could leverage it.

    Operationalizing this shift requires coordination across vulnerability management, attack surface visibility, penetration testing, and exposure intelligence platforms to prioritize what attackers can actually use.

    Topics include:

    • Using exploit intelligence and business context to prioritize remediation over CVSS scores alone
    • Mapping the gap between what is vulnerable and what is actually exploitable
    • Operationalizing continuous threat exposure management across hybrid environments

    Explore how leading organizations are replacing volume-based patching with risk-informed remediation that focuses on what attackers can actually use.

    Topics:
    , , , , ,