Penetration Testing

Events

Views Navigation

Event Views Navigation

Today

    • You’re Patching the Wrong Vulnerabilities. Exploit Intelligence Says So.

    With more than 40,000 new CVEs published in the past year alone and projections exceeding 50,000 for 2025, patching everything is impossible. Most organizations prioritize remediation by CVSS severity scores, but severity does not equal exploitability. Research shows that 32% of reported security issues have a low probability of exploitation, while some moderate-severity vulnerabilities sit on active exploit chains right now.

    The shift from vulnerability management to exposure management reflects a growing recognition that context matters more than volume. Organizations need to know not just what is vulnerable but whether a vulnerability is reachable from the internet, whether an exploit exists in the wild, what business-critical assets sit in the blast radius, and how quickly an attacker could leverage it.

    Operationalizing this shift requires coordination across vulnerability management, attack surface visibility, penetration testing, and exposure intelligence platforms to prioritize what attackers can actually use.

    Topics include:

    • Using exploit intelligence and business context to prioritize remediation over CVSS scores alone
    • Mapping the gap between what is vulnerable and what is actually exploitable
    • Operationalizing continuous threat exposure management across hybrid environments

    Explore how leading organizations are replacing volume-based patching with risk-informed remediation that focuses on what attackers can actually use.

    Topics:
    , , , , ,

    • The Assets You Don't Know About Are the Ones Getting Breached. Solving the Visibility-first Problem.

    Most organizations cannot produce a complete, accurate inventory of their external-facing assets. Shadow IT, forgotten cloud instances, unmonitored APIs, development environments left exposed, and acquired company infrastructure that was never integrated into security tooling all create blind spots. Attackers do not need to find a zero-day when a staging server with default credentials is sitting on a public IP. The assets that security teams do not know about are, by definition, the ones that are not being monitored, patched, or protected.

    Attack surface management starts with a premise that most vulnerability management programs skip: you cannot secure what you have not discovered. Addressing this requires coordination across ASM, CTEM, vulnerability management, penetration testing, and cloud security platforms to build a continuous view of the external attack surface as an attacker sees it, not as the asset inventory says it should look. The gap between those two views is where breaches happen. Organizations that have adopted this approach report finding assets they did not know existed, exposures that had persisted for months, and risk concentrations in areas their existing tools were not scanning.

    Topics include:

    • Continuously discovering and attributing external-facing assets beyond the known inventory
    • Identifying shadow IT, orphaned cloud resources, and unmonitored development environments
    • Prioritizing discovered exposures based on exploitability, business context, and attacker perspective

    Discover how organizations are closing the gap between what they think their attack surface looks like and what it actually is.

    Topics:
    , , , , ,